About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
https://www.omanophthalmicsociety.org/ Users Online: 360  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 144-148  

Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Iranian patients


Department of Opthalmology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Kermanshah, Iran

Date of Submission25-Aug-2020
Date of Decision12-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance09-Oct-2020
Date of Web Publication20-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Aashkan Safarzadeh Khoushabi
Imam Khomeini Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Kermanshah
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_18_21

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


BACKGROUND: The outcome of penetration into keratoplasty (PK) related to corneal disease is responsible for corneal blindness. The aim of this study is to evaluate the indications and visual outcome of PK in Imam Khomeini Hospital in Kermanshah from March 2017 to March 2019.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were reviewed from the medical records of 115 PK done in the Department of Ophthalmology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Kermanshah, from March 2017 to March 2019. Data analysis done using paired Student's t-test for hypothesis testing of grouped values of preoperative and the last follow-up best-corrected visual acuity in cases of optical and therapeutic grafts. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: In this study, the data of 115 eyes of 108 patients were reviewed. The most common indication for keratoplasty was corneal scarring including adherent leucoma, 34 (29.56%). Therapeutic keratoplasty was done for 26 patients. One case of tectonic graft was included in therapeutic keratoplasty group for analysis. There was statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001) in best-corrected visual acuity improvement from 1.36 logMAR + 0.024 (standard deviation [SD]) preoperatively to 0.357 logMAR + 0.42 (SD) postoperatively and 1.4 logMAR + 0.000 (SD) preoperatively to 0.15 logMAR + 0.55 (SD) postoperatively for optical and therapeutic grafts, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Active or treated infectious keratitis was one of the most important indications for keratoplasty. Symptoms of poor prognosis were more pronounced in this part of the country. Patients' vision after corneal transplantation was encouraging, especially in cases of optical keratoplasty.

Keywords: Eye bank, keratoconus, penetrating keratoplasty


How to cite this article:
Eidizadeh M, Ebadi-Soflou L, Khoushabi AS. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Iranian patients. Oman J Ophthalmol 2021;14:144-8

How to cite this URL:
Eidizadeh M, Ebadi-Soflou L, Khoushabi AS. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Iranian patients. Oman J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27];14:144-8. Available from: https://www.ojoonline.org/text.asp?2021/14/3/144/328602




   Introduction Top


Although corneal opacity is a common cause of visual loss in developing countries, access to sight restoring corneal transplantation remains challenging for many patients.[1] In poor health-care systems, penetrating keratoplasty management is complicated by a lack of supportive infrastructure such as eye banks, operating rooms, and up-to-date equipment.

There may also be limited access to trained corneal surgeons and follow-up care and little opportunity for corrective lenses for visual rehabilitation.[2],[3]

Keratoplasty is the only way to restore vision in corneal blindness, and its success rate in developing countries (46.5%) is lower than that in developed countries.[4] There are numerous reports of signs of penetration into keratoplasty (PK) in developed and developing countries. Signs of corneal transplantation with poor prognosis for transplant survival are more common in Iran than in the developed world.[5],[6]

In developing countries, corneal disease is the major cause of visual impairment and blindness. Various infectious and inflammatory conditions cause corneal opacity and blindness. This imposes many problems on the health-care systems of the countries. The most common pathogens in active infectious keratitis are staph epidermidis, staph aureus, and fungal infections.[7]

The data available in 2000 suggest that there are approximately 50 million blind people in the world.[8] Currently, PK is done on 100 large and small ophthalmology centers in Iran. Tissue requirements for PK and similar methods have been proposed by one institution called, “The Central Eye Bank of Iran IR located in Capital, Tehran.”

This study is important in that it has not yet been evaluated in the Western part of the country, and complications of keratitis are also very common due to the late referral of patients to hospitals. With the increase in the number of corneal surgeons in Iran and increased PK levels in patients with corneal blindness, we did a retrospective study conducted to identify indications for corneal transplant surgery.


   Materials and Methods Top


This retrospective study compiled and reviewed the eye bank records of patients who had undergone corneal grafting in Imam Khomeini Hospital in Kermanshah from March 2017 to March 2019. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR.KUMS.1398.1013).

Patient data including gender and age, surgical techniques, and indications for keratoplasty were retrieved. The absolute and relative frequencies and percentages were provided for each indication and surgical technique. All patients with these criteria were included in the study during this period.

Patients were divided into three age groups: 0–20, 20–49, and 50–50 years, and they were examined for corneal transplant criteria. PK symptoms were divided into 8 diagnoses.

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with pinhole, glasses, and rigid gas permeable lenses for high astigmatism, intraocular pressure, and graft clarity were recorded postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year period for all patients. One-year follow-up was considered as the last follow-up. The records were reviewed for age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and preoperative BCVA. Surgical details were noted in terms of grades of the graft used, and any additional procedures such as cataract surgery, trabeculectomy, intraocular lens (IOL) explantation, triple procedure, vitrectomy, and goniosynechialysis were recorded.

Outcomes were evaluated in terms of infection cure rate in therapeutic grafts, graft clarity, and final BCVA for optical grafts. Complications if any were noted for all cases. Graft rejection was considered mild if there were 1–5 keratic precipitates (KPs), subepithelial infiltrates, and increased corneal thickness without anterior chamber reaction and severe if >5 KPs with stromal infiltrates, endothelial rejection line, and increased corneal thickness with anterior chamber reaction. Graft clarity was Grade 4 if clear view of iris details was possible, Grade 2–3 without good view of iris details, and Grade 1–0 for opaque graft with no or poor view of anterior chamber details.[9],[10] Graft failure was defined as irreversible loss of graft clarity with rejection episode for 3 months or more. BCVA were converted from the Snellen units to the logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR).

SPSS software (version 22; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analysis. Paired Student's t-test was used for hypothesis testing of grouped values of preoperative and the last follow-up BCVA in cases of optical and therapeutic grafts. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results Top


In the present study, 115 eyes from 108 patients were examined, three of which were reconstructive and one was bilateral. The age at which PK was performed varied from 20 to 20 years (mean 50.34 years, SD 17.45 years). In this study, men and women were 75 (65.21%) and 40 (34.78%), respectively. The highest age group of 77 patients (66.95%) was over 50 years. The right eye was involved in 64 (55.65%) cases.

The most common indication for PK was corneal scarring including adherent leucoma 34 (29.56%) and keratoconus was seen in 4 (3.47%). Corneal dystrophy was seen in 4 (3.47%) cases, with Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy in 1 (0.86%) case and stromal dystrophy (2 eyes of granular dystrophy type 1 and one eye of granular dystrophy type II) in 3 (2.60%) [Table 1].
Table 1: Indications of keratoplasty

Click here to view


Tectonic PK was performed in 25 cases. Of the 24 cases (20.8%) infected with infectious keratitis, a maximum of 18 (75.75%) were from corneal puncture wounds and 6 cases (25.25%) were non-trimmed corneal wounds that were treated with medication. They did not answer or were punctured. Among the cases of infectious keratitis, 10 (41.6%) bacterial and 5 (16.6%) fungi have been confirmed by fungal histopathological report [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Distribution of indications for therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty

Click here to view


PK was done for optical reasons in majority of 89 (77.39%) eyes. Plain osteopoikilosis (OPK) and triple procedure were done in 67 (75.28%) and 12 (13.48%), respectively. In 2 (2.24%) cases, IOL was not put because of very high myopia in one case and posterior capsular rent in other case where anterior vitrectomy was done [Table 2].
Table 2: Procedures performed

Click here to view


In all cases underwent OPK, BCVA was preoperative <20/20>, with 81 cases (91/91 ÷ 91) of BCVA <20/400. In the last follow-up, a maximum of 41 (46.06) cases fell to the level of BCVA 20/20–20/200 and 31 (34.83%) BCVA >20.60 [Table 3]. All cases of corneal and keratoconus dystrophy achieving BCVA more than 20/60 by the last follow up. Except one case whom transplantation was not performed. BCVA improved from 1.36 logMAR + 0.024 (SD) before surgery to 0.357 logMAR + 0.42 (SD) after surgery in the last follow-up of one year. Statistically, a significant difference (P = 0.0001, P = 0.89) was observed with an average difference of 1.02.
Table 3: Distribution of visual acuity in optical grafts

Click here to view


The degree of transparency of the graft tissue was 72 (62.60%), Grade 3 in 16 (13.91%), and Grade 1 in 16 (13.91%) Grade 4. Eleven patients (56.9%) with glaucoma after keratoplasty surgery (PKP) who were resistant to three anticancer drugs and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (0.2 mg/ml) were performed to save the transplant in all cases.

One case with pre-existing glucomatous optic atrophy which led to graft failure, Rests (n = 10) survived with good visual outcome (BCVA of 20/60– 20/200). Secondary graft failure occurred in (n = 14, 15.73%) eyes due to infection, ≥2 episodes of severe graft rejection, endothelial failure and glaucoma in 4 (28.57%), 4 (28.57%), 3 (21.42%), and 3 eyes (21.42%), respectively. Out of 4 cases of infection, two cases were recurrent herpetic viral keratitis presented with persistent epithelial defect and graft thinning. Amniotic membrane transplantation was done for these cases to avoid perforation and the goal was achieved but graft got opacified. Five (5.61%) cases had one episode of mild graft rejection and were given methylprednisolone 1 g intravenous stat, followed by oral and topical steroids as well as immunosuppressant like topical cyclosporine (0.05%), and rejection was reversed with clear graft. In two cases, subconjunctival avastin (2.5 mg in 0.1 ml) was given for regression of the graft vascularization ≥2 quadrants.

Therapeutic success

Successful treatment has been defined as the complete elimination of primary infection after keratoplasty with appropriate medical treatment.

For visual acuity and graft clarity assessment, one case of tectonic graft was considered under group of TPK as the donor cornea used was of Grade B. Of the 26 patients, 22 (84.61%) patients achieved therapeutic success maintaining structural integrity as n = 1 underwent evisceration and n = 2 got phthisic. Therapeutic failure was defined as recurrent graft infection despite medical and surgical intervention. Therapeutic failure occurred in 2 (7.69%) cases: in one case, amniotic membrane transplantation was done to avoid graft melting and stabilization of infection was achieved and one eye underwent evisceration. Complications other than reinfection were glaucoma in 4 (15.38%) cases that underwent trabeculectomy, choroidal detachment in one case which resolved later on with oral steroids, and glaucomatous optic atrophy in one case. All cases had BCVA <20/400 at presentation. At the last follow-up, only 2 (7.69%) eyes had BCVA of >20/60 and maximum cases 14 (53.84%) fell in the group of <20/400 [Table 4]. The graft clarity was Grade 4, 3, and 1 in 5 (19.23%), 5 (19.23%), and 16 (61.53%) cases, respectively.
Table 4: Distribution of visual acuity in therapeutic grafts

Click here to view


The BCVA improved from 1.4 logMAR + 0.000 (standard deviation [SD]) preoperatively to 0.15 logMAR + 0.0.55 (SD) postoperatively at the last follow-up. There was statistically significant difference (P = 0.0001, n = 26) with the mean difference of 1.13.


   Discussion Top


PK can repair the vision of blind corneal patients with various corneal pathologies. The outcome depends on the pathology responsible for corneal blindness or visual impairment.[11]

The present study evaluated 115 eye bank records of corneal transplantation procedures performed between 2017 and 2019.

The course of keratoplasty has changed in Iran over the past eight years. The top six indications in our study were KCN, BK, COS, graft failure, corneal dystrophies, and keratitis, which is different from our previous nationwide report,[12] where the top 5 diagnoses were KCN, COS, BK, corneal dystrophies, and graft failure.

Infective keratitis was a common component in both optical and therapeutic grafts as healed and active keratitis in respective grafts. As compared to the present study, the corneal scarring has been reported to be the proportionally less indication in developed world.[12],[13] Bullous keratopathy was the second common indication for PK in the present study of 30 (26.09%) of total indications, which is comparable to other studies.[8],[14] In this study, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy was more common than aphakic bullous keratopathy. Corneal dystrophies and keratoconus formed very small proportion of indications as compared to developed countries, where keratoconus made up higher proportion of the indications for PK ranging from 7.0% to 31% with a median value of 17.1%.[15],[16],[17] Infective keratitis formed the major indication (40.9%) for keratoplasty in Nepal,[15] which is very high as compared to Iranian studies.[12]

The OPK and TPK were done for different indications, but the difference of visual outcome preoperatively and the last follow-up was statistically significant in both indications.[18]

The most common sign of OPK in this study is corneal opacity due to ulcers, which is comparable to the results of other published Iranian studies.[2] Instead, corneal scarring was not a sign of OPK in Western countries, but it was keratoconus.

All cases of corneal dystrophy and keratoconus were there in the group of BCVA of >20/60. In the present study, corneal dystrophy and keratoconus were good prognosis cases as reported by Dandona et al.[19] All four cases of ABK developed glaucoma due to which graft failed in three cases, but one graft could survive due to early trabeculectomy. ABK was one of the worst prognoses in optical grafts as supported by other study.[19]

The success of TPK lies in eradication of the primary infection and salvageability of the globe loss of vision or even eyes may be caused by a variety of infectious or inflammatory diseases. The prognosis is likely to be poor in patients receiving emergency corneal transplantation due to severe infectious keratitis.

Following stabilization of the eye, repeat keratoplasty can be performed on an elective basis for optical purposes. Of the 26 patients, 22 (84.61%) patients achieved therapeutic success maintaining structural integrity and stabilization of the eye, which is comparable to the results of Ti et al.[20] In the present study, only 16 (61.53%) cases regained BCVA >20/200, which is comparable to the results of Ti et al.,[12] where the number of eyes with BCVA >6/60 (20/200) was 58.5%. Graft clarity varied by indications for transplantation as in corneal scarring, infective keratitis, and keratoconus. The graft clarity was comparable to the Indian study by Varghese et al.[21] For bullous keratopathy, graft clarity in the present study was comparable to the studies conducted by Randleman et al. and Zare et al.[22],[23]

Limitations

There are few limitations to this study, as we did not analyze the donor's details, such as the donor's age, the cause of the donor's death, or the length of time the donor tissue was preserved, which could affect the survival of the transplant.

In cases of corneal dystrophy, the anterior deep lamellar keratoplasty has not been performed due to limited equipment requirements. Assessment of vision results is based on BCVA, but information on astigmatism is not available for the entire series. Due to international sanctions and the resulting problems, some equipment was not available, but surgeons preferred to do penetrating keratoplasty.


   Conclusion Top


In the current study, active or improved wound keratitis is the leading cause of both types of PK with good vision improvement. Infectious keratitis has been common in this part of Iran due to the predominance of farmers.

The data reported in this paper suggest that PK could be a very successful way to visualize the outcome in this part of the developing world for many reasons.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: A global perspective. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:214-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tilahun Y, Shimelash D. The outcome of corneal transplantation versus indications in a tertiary eye care center in Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 2010;48:35-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Yorston D, Wood M, Foster A. Penetrating keratoplasty in Africa: Graft survival and visual outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:890-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73:115-21.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Foster A. Vision 2020 – The right to sight (editorial). Trop Doct 2003;33:193-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Garg P, Krishna PV, Stratis AK, Gopinathan U. The value of corneal transplantation in reducing blindness. Eye (Lond) 2005;19:1106-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rao GN. Cornea and blindness. Indian J Ophthalmol 1994;42:169.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Dandona L, Ragu K, Janarthanan M, Naduvilath TJ, Shenoy R, Rao GN. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 1997;45:163-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Panda A. Essentials of Eye Banking. 1st ed. New Delhi: Asia Printograph, Shahdara, Delhi; 2003. p. 75-86.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
McDonnell PJ, Enger C, Stark WJ, Stulting RD. Corneal thickness changes after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1374-81.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Price FW Jr., Whitson WE, Collins KS, Marks RG. Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:799-805.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kanavi MR, Javadi MA, Sanagoo M. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in Iran. Cornea 2007;26:561-3.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Vail A, Gore SM, Bradley BA, Easty DL, Rogers CA. Corneal transplantation in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77:650-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, Vajpayee RB. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India. Cornea 2005;24:989-91.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mamalis N, Anderson CW, Kreisler KR, Lundergan MK, Olson RJ. Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1409-11.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lindquist TD, McGlothan JS, Rotkis WM, Chandler JW. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty: 1980-1988. Cornea 1991;10:210-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Mohamadi P, McDonnell JM, Irvine JA, McDonnell PJ, Rao N, Smith RE. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1984-88. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:550-2.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Bajracharya L, Gurung R, Demarchis EH, Oliva M, Ruit S, Tabin G. Indications for keratoplasty in Nepal: 2005 – 2010. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2013;5:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Janarthanan M, Ragu K, Rao GN. Survival analysis and visual outcome in a large series of corneal transplants in India. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:726-31.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ti SE, Scott JA, Janardhanan P, Tan DT. Therapeutic keratoplasty for advanced suppurative keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:755-62.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Varghese AC, Jabbar A, Reesha KR. Outcome of a large Series of penetrating keratoplasties in a tertiary eye care centre – A 6 year retrospective study. Kerala J Ophthalmol 2011;23:47-51.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Randleman JB, Song CD, Palay DA. Indications for and outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty performed by resident surgeons. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:68-75.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zare M, Javadi MA, Einollahi B, Karimian F, Rafie AR, Feizi S, et al. Changing indications and surgical techniques for corneal transplantation between 2004 and 2009 at a tertiary referral center. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2012;19:323-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed224    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal