About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
https://www.omanophthalmicsociety.org/ Users Online: 340  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents    
CLINICAL QUIZ
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 62-63  

Superficial punctate keratitis: A diagnostic dilemma


Cornea and Anterior Segment Services, Jamshedpur Eye Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India

Date of Web Publication27-Feb-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Rashmi Mittal
Jamshedpur Eye Hospital, Kalimati Road, Sakchi, Jamshedpur - 831 001, Jharkhand
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ojo.OJO_167_2019

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mittal R. Superficial punctate keratitis: A diagnostic dilemma. Oman J Ophthalmol 2021;14:62-3

How to cite this URL:
Mittal R. Superficial punctate keratitis: A diagnostic dilemma. Oman J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 22];14:62-3. Available from: https://www.ojoonline.org/text.asp?2021/14/1/62/190053



A30-year-old immunocompetent male presented to our outpatient department with complaints of pain, redness, and watering and hazy vision in the left eye for the past 1 week. He had a history of swimming in a pond 10 days back. Visual acuity was 6/6 in the right eye and 6/9 in the left eye. Slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination revealed diffuse, multifocal, coarse, raised, punctate epithelial lesions on the cornea that stained negatively with fluorescein [Figure 1]. The underlying stroma was normal. The conjunctiva showed a papillary response. The raised corneal lesions were scraped using number 15 blade, smeared on a glass slide, and stained with Gram stain. Microbiology examination of the slide revealed numerous Gram-positive, oval, nonbudding bodies under ×100 oil immersion field [Figure 2]. The oval bodies were 1% acid fast. He was treated with topical gatifloxacin 0.5% eye drops six times a day for 10 days. The lesions healed completely, and vision returned to 6/6 after 10 days.
Figure 1: Slit-lamp photograph in diffuse illumination showing punctate epithelial lesions with a “stuck-on appearance” on the cornea

Click here to view
Figure 2: Microbiology examination of the corneal smear (Gram stain, ×100, oil immersion) demonstrating multiple Gram-positive, oval, nonbudding structures

Click here to view


  1. What is the diagnosis?


    1. Microsporidial epithelial keratoconjunctivitis
    2. Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis (AK)
    3. Thygeson's superficial punctate keratopathy (TSPK)
    4. Keratitis medicamentosa.


  2. Which is the peak season for this condition?


    1. Winter
    2. Summer
    3. Rainy
    4. Spring.


  3. What is the best treatment option for this patient?


    1. Observation
    2. Topical antibiotics plus steroids
    3. Corneal scraping alone
    4. Scraping plus topical antibiotics.


For answers please see page 63.

Answers for Clinical Quiz


   Answers Top


  1. a
  2. c
  3. d.



   Discussion Top


Microsporidia are unicellular, spore-forming parasites. Conventionally, these were considered as Protozoans, but, more recently, these have been classified as fungi.[1] There are two distinct forms of keratitis caused by this organism – epithelial keratoconjunctivitis and stromal keratitis. Keratoconjunctivitis is more common form of the disease. Contrary to the olden belief, this infection can be seen in immunocompromised as well as immunocompetent individuals.[1],[2],[3] The incidence rises dramatically during the rainy season, as contaminated water is the most common source of infection.[1],[2],[3] Clinically, it needs to be differentiated from other causes of superficial punctate keratitis such as AK and TSPK. Microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis is characterized by unilateral, diffuse, monomorphic, coarse, elevated SPKs with round borders. There is no associated lymphadenopathy, and all lesions heal well with supportive therapy alone, without any scarring. Corneal scraping helps in laboratory diagnosis as well as debulks the infectious load.[1],[2],[3] Prophylactic topical antibiotics prevent secondary infection. Topical steroids should be avoided as they can lead to persistence of the organism within the epithelial cells. In contrast, SPKs of AK are less coarse and are usually associated with subepithelial infiltrates involving the anterior stroma. This can be very well appreciated on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Lesions are pleomorphic and are usually associated with preauricular lymphadenopathy. Treatment usually requires antibiotics and steroids and scarring is common despite adequate treatment. TSPK, on the other hand, presents with chronic remissions and exacerbations. SPKs are typically central, are monomorphic, and have “crenated” edges. They respond dramatically to topical steroids and heal without scarring.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Garg P. Microsporidia infection of the cornea – A unique and challenging disease. Cornea 2013;32 Suppl 1:S33-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Thanathanee O, Athikulwongse R, Anutarapongpan O, Laummaunwai P, Maleewong W, Intapan PM, et al. Clinical features, risk factors, and treatments of Microsporidial epithelial keratitis. Semin Ophthalmol 2016;31:266-70.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Das S, Sharma S, Sahu SK, Nayak SS, Kar S. Diagnosis, clinical features and treatment outcome of microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:793-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
     Answers
     Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed235    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded2    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal