About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
https://www.omanophthalmicsociety.org/ Users Online: 99  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents    
CASE REPORT
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 58-61  

Bilateral absent medial rectus with neurological abnormalities: A rare clinical presentation and its management


Department of Pediatric Opthalmology, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication5-Mar-2018

Correspondence Address:
Soumya Nambiar
Flat No: 5E, Sreerosh Seascape Thalassery, Kannur, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ojo.OJO_229_2014

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


We discuss here an interesting case of strabismus, due to bilateral absent medial rectus muscle associated with brain anomalies, and its surgical management.

Keywords: Absent medial rectus, congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders, transposition


How to cite this article:
Nambiar S, Natarajan KK. Bilateral absent medial rectus with neurological abnormalities: A rare clinical presentation and its management. Oman J Ophthalmol 2018;11:58-61

How to cite this URL:
Nambiar S, Natarajan KK. Bilateral absent medial rectus with neurological abnormalities: A rare clinical presentation and its management. Oman J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 May 25];11:58-61. Available from: http://www.ojoonline.org/text.asp?2018/11/1/58/226343




   Introduction Top


Virtually all extraocular muscles have been described as being congenitally absent, and the management of such complex cases can be a challenge to the surgeons. We discuss here a case with bilateral absence of medial rectus (MR) associated with brain anomalies, which could be a variant of congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders (CCDDs). To our knowledge, only a few cases of absent MR have been reported in the literature up to date, and none of these showed any neurological associations, as seen in our case.


   Case Report Top


A 1½-year-old child presented with a history of outward squinting of both eyes (BE) since birth. He was born from a second-degree consanguineous marriage following a forceps delivery. He had a stormy perinatal period with birth asphyxia and a history of seizures at 3 months of age. No significant family history was present. On examination, the child had low set ears with obliquely placed palpebral fissures. He had a chin elevation and a right face turn, associated with high-frequency jerk nystagmus, and was strongly resisting occlusion to the left eye (LE). Both eyes were turned out with right eye more than left and both the eyes were not able to adduct even upto the midline. There was no ptosis, aberrant regeneration, or palpebral fissure changes. Anterior segment examination was unremarkable, except for the presence of microcornea in BE. Fundus was normal in BE. A magnetic resonance imaging was advised which revealed vermian hypoplasia with ballooning of the 4th ventricle, hypoplastic cerebellar hemispheres, moderate dilatation of lateral ventricles, dilated cortical sulci, and shallow orbits [Figure 1]a,[Figure 1]b,[Figure 1]c,[Figure 1]d. A gross lateral deviation of the eyeball was seen, with inability to visualize the medial recti on both sides [Figure 1]e. Rest of the extraocular muscles (EOMs) had a normal course and thickness. The child was referred to a neurologist but lost to follow-up; only to return 10 years later, with constant outward deviation of RE more than LE. On examination during this visit, he had a right face turn with a slight chin-up posture [Figure 2]. The best-corrected visual acuity was 6/18 and N6 BE. Worth's four dot test showed right suppression for distance and near, and stereoacuity was poor measured with Randot stereotest. Prism bar cover test (PBCT) showed >90 prism diopters (PD) of exotropia. The ocular motility showed a limitation of adduction not even up to midline and an elevation limitation of − 3 in BE [Figure 3]. A differential diagnosis of pupil-sparing third nerve palsy, a variant of CCDDs, or a wall-eyed bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia was made. A lateral rectus (LR) hemi-hang back and medial partial transposition of superior rectus (SR) and inferior rectus (IR) was planned in both the eyes to correct the abnormal head posture and for cosmesis. A forced duction test done on the table revealed a tight LR and minimally positive for IR. Force generation test was not done. A 360° peritomy was performed, and exploration around the insertion of MR was made, but the muscle could not be identified. The LR muscle was found to be extremely tight and was hooked and isolated with great difficulty. Placement sutures were placed with 6-0 vicryl close to its insertion. The muscle was recessed using a hemi-hang back technique by taking sclera bites 10 mm (mm) behind the insertion site and leaving the cut insertion end, 5 mm behind the scleral bites (total hang back of 15 mm). SR was identified, isolated, and bluntly dissected with a small muscle hook into half, approximately 14–18 mm posteriorly from insertion. Two sutures of 6-0 vicryl was passed through the medial half of the SR close to its insertion, disinserted, and resutured back 5.5 mm behind the medial limbus at the apparent insertion site of MR. The half-width tendon was then anchored to the sclera 8 mm behind the new insertion with 5-0 mersilk; the same procedure was repeated for the IR muscle. In view of anticipated compromised blood supply, only a partial thickness muscle transposition was performed in BE sparing the anterior ciliary vessels. SR muscle was found to be normal in position and caliber.
Figure 1: (a-e) Magnetic resonance imaging

Click here to view
Figure 2: Abnormal head posture

Click here to view
Figure 3: Preoperative 9 gaze photos

Click here to view


Conjunctival closure was performed with 8-0 vicryl interrupted sutures. The same procedure was performed in the other eye. The inferior oblique muscle was noted to be inserted more posteriorly in BE.

On the 1st postoperative day, the alignment seemed to be good. On the 2nd postoperative day, PBCT showed a right esotropia of 20 PD with 12 PD of L/R with the child complaining of diplopia but significant improvement in head posture. His adduction and elevation improved to − 2 BE. At 15 days and 1 month of follow-up, the child still had diplopia with 16 PD esotropia and 10 L/R for distance and near with minimal right head tilt. On the last follow-up 1 year postoperation, he had a significant improvement in the head posture with no diplopa. On PBCT, he had a 20 PD esotropia with 15 PD right hypertropia [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Postoperative photos

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The EOMs are mesodermal in origin and start to develop at 3–4 weeks of gestation. The EOMs receive innervations from their respective nerves as early as 1 month of gestation.[1] Our case with bilateral absence of MR associated with brain anomalies could be a variant of CCDDs. The CCDDs represent static congenital abnormalities of eye movement with or without associated systemic abnormalities which may or may not be inherited, and there occurs some disturbance in the development of brainstem nuclei or the brainstem white matter or peripheral neurons.[2] This group of disorders has received a lot of attention recently as there are several genes that cause individual clinical entities. Numerous causative genetic abnormalities have been identified which may involve exclusively the brainstem (ROBO3), the brainstem with both local and remote sequelae (HOXA1), the brainstem with predominantly lower motor neuron sequelae (PHOX2A), and lower motor neuron axonal guidance (KIF21A, TUBB3), sometimes with syndromic features (SALL4, CHN1, TUBB2B, and TUBB3). Every CCDDs gene characterized since 2002 has been associated with neuronal development at the nuclear, brainstem, or peripheral nerve level, supporting the hypothesis that CCDDs are neurogenic in origin.[3] In our case, a genetic analysis may help in identification of any gene abnormality. This may also support the hypothesis of a neurogenic origin of CCDDs, but the possibility of a syndrome complex also cannot be ruled out.

Again, the management of such complex cases is a real challenge. Partial- or full-tendon transposition procedures[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11] were introduced for the treatment of complex ocular motility abnormalities on the assumption that, they induced both, an active tonic force, by changing the duction force vectors and an increase in passive elastic forces, because of the longer route of the transposed muscles. A study by Snir et al. recommended combined medial vertical rectus muscle transposition with medial posterior fixation sutures for patients with adduction deficiency.[12] Paysse et al. described an augmented full-tendon transposition of the vertical rectus muscles to the MR muscle insertion in one patient with partial third nerve palsy.[13] They noted a significant reduction in distance and near exo deviation from 60 to 70 PD preoperatively to 10 PD of intermittent exotropia at distance and 10–20 PD exotropia at near postoperatively. In our case, a LR recession alone would not have corrected the large exotropia, and a full-tendon transposition with LR recession had the possibility of producing anterior segment ischemia. Another modality is the injection of Botox to the tight LR with transposition, but this neurotoxin treatment cannot be expected to release the tightness associated with a chronic deviation caused by secondary structural changes in the muscle, conjunctiva, anterior Tenon's capsule, and intermuscular membrane (posterior Tenon's capsule). Botox alone cannot change the movement in the field of action of the missing muscle, and in addition, a repeat injection cannot be contemplated in this child, due to the complicacy of repeated general anesthesia. Hence, a partial-tendon transposition with posterior fixation was contemplated in our case along with LR recession. The child had diplopia and head posture in the first few postoperative visits which disappeared on the last visit, which could be attributed to a change in his vertical alignment. A similar case by Hill[14] and Houtman et al.[15] was described wherein they successfully treated the absent MR with vertical-tendon transposition.

We believe this case to be a variant of CCDDs or some syndrome complex requiring a genetic analysis. Surgical management of such complex cases could provide a cosmetic and psychological benefit to the patients.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Gilbert PW. The origin and development of human extrinsic ocular muscle. Contrib Embryol Carnegie Inst 1957;36:59-78.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bosley TM, Abu-Amero KK, Oystreck DT. Congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders: A concept in evolution. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2013;24:398-406.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Gutowski NJ, Bosley TM, Engle EC. 110th ENMC international workshop: The congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders (CCDDs). Naarden, the Netherlands, 25-27 October, 2002. Neuromuscul Disord 2003;13:573-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Rønne G. Hummelsheim's operation; technique and results. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1954;32:633-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rosenbaum AL, Foster RS, Ballard E, Rosales T, Gruenberg P, Choy A. Complete superior and inferior rectus transposition with adjustable medial rectus recession for abducens palsy. Strabismus 1984;2:599-605.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Rosenbaum AL, Kushner BJ, Kirschen D. Vertical rectus muscle transposition and botulinum toxin (Oculinum) to medial rectus for abducens palsy. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:820-3.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.
Brooks SE, Olitsky SE, deB Ribeiro G. Augmented hummelsheim procedure for paralytic strabismus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2000;37:189-95.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.
Molarte AB, Rosenbaum AL. Vertical rectus muscle transposition surgery for Duane's syndrome. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1990;27:171-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Wybar KC. Management of sixth nerve palsy and Duane's retraction syndrome. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1981;101:276-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Laby DM, Rosenbaum AL. Adjustable vertical rectus muscle transposition surgery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1994;31:75-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
O'Connor R. Tendon transplantation in ocular-muscle paralysis. Am J Ophthalmol 1935;18:813-20.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Snir M, Friling R, Kalish-Stiebel H, Sherf I, Weinberger D, Axer-Siegel R, et al. Full vertical rectus muscle transposition combined with medial posterior fixation sutures for patients with adduction deficiency. Ophthalmology 2005;112:939-43.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Paysse EA, Brady McCreery KM, Ross A, Coats DK. Use of augmented rectus muscle transposition surgery for complex strabismus. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1309-14.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Hill HF. Absence of the medial rectus and its successful treatment by vertical tendon transplants. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1955;53:115-20.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.
Houtman AC, Hocking G, Lloyd C, Biswas S. Large-angle congenital exotropia due to 'absent' medial recti: A case of congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1489-90.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1153    
    Printed39    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded16    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal