About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
Users Online: 285  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents    
CLINICAL QUIZ
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 263  

Two brothers with reduced vision


1 Department of Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India
2 Department of Cardiology, AIIMS, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India

Date of Web Publication5-Oct-2017

Correspondence Address:
Anupam Singh
Department of Ophthalmology, AIIMS, Rishikesh - 249 203, Uttarakhand
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ojo.OJO_12_2015

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh A, Kumar B, Piplani B, Bahuguna C, Kumar G. Two brothers with reduced vision. Oman J Ophthalmol 2017;10:263

How to cite this URL:
Singh A, Kumar B, Piplani B, Bahuguna C, Kumar G. Two brothers with reduced vision. Oman J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2018 Sep 18];10:263. Available from: http://www.ojoonline.org/text.asp?2017/10/3/263/215988

6-year-old boy and his 18-month-old younger brother presented to outpatient department with decreased vision and abnormal appearance of eyes since early childhood. They were otherwise healthy and born at term out of a consanguineous marriage. The best-corrected visual acuity in the elder brother was 6/12, N8 right eye and 6/36, N10 left eye with refractive error of + 7 D sph/+2 D cyl axis 90° in both eyes. Refractive error in his sibling was + 8 D sph/+2 D cyl axis 180° both eyes. In both children, ocular examination revealed small, horizontally oval corneas [8–9 mm horizontal diameter; [Figure 1] with wide limbal zone. There were superficial stromal central nebulomacular corneal opacities in both eyes without any associated vascularization. Intraocular pressures were normal with clear lens and clear red reflex posterior segment findings were with in normal limits.
Figure 1: Clinical photograph of case one showing central nebulomacular cornea opacity, horizontally oval and flat cornea

Click here to view



   Questions Top


  1. What is the differential diagnosis?
  2. What additional test is required to confirm the diagnosis?
  3. How will you manage these cases?



   Answers for Clinical Quiz Top




Click here to view answer. View Answer


 
   References Top

1.
Pellegata NS, Dieguez-Lucena JL, Joensuu T, Lau S, Montgomery KT, Krahe R, et al. Mutations in KERA, encoding keratocan, cause cornea plana. Nat Genet 2000;25:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Lehmann OJ, El-ashry MF, Ebenezer ND, Ocaka L, Francis PJ, Wilkie SE, et al. A novel keratocan mutation causing autosomal recessive cornea plana. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:3118-22.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Khan A, Al-Saif A, Kambouris M. A novel KERA mutation associated with autosomal recessive cornea plana. Ophthalmic Genet 2004;25:147-52.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Questions
    Answers for Clin...
   Answers
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed630    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal