About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
https://www.omanophthalmicsociety.org/ Users Online: 2149  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 27-31  

Visual acuity and refractive status of Omani students with refractive error in grades 1, 4 and 7: A retrospective cohort study


1 Department of Primary Health, Eye Health Care, Ministry of Health, Oman
2 Imam Mohammed Bin Saud Islamic University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Research, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication10-Feb-2016

Correspondence Address:
Rajiv Khandekar
Department of Research, King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-620X.176097

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: The visual and refractive status were assessed for grade 7 students in seven governorates in Oman. The health records were reviewed to assess the rationale for their previous school-based vision screening.
Methods: A representative sample of 7 th grade students with a refractive error (RE) was examined by optometrists in 2012. Their compliance with spectacle wear was also reviewed. Each student's vision and refractive status in grades 1 and 4 were compared with the status in grade 7. Each student's use of eye care services between grade 4 and 7 was evaluated to determine the uptake of existing eye services for vision problems.
Results: This study had 286, 7 th grade students with RE (myopia [94%], hyperopia [4%] and astigmatism [>1D] [2%]). The types of RE between genders in each grade were not significant (P > 0.05). During their vision screening when they were in grade 4, 5 of 13 moderate myopes (>−2D to − 6D) and 3 of 4 high myopes (>−6D) were detected and managed. Ten students with moderate and high myopia were already using spectacles before they were screened in grade 7. The compliance for spectacle wear was 62% in grade 7. Between grades, 4 and 7, 140 (49%) students did not visit eye clinics or an optician.
Conclusions: Refractive services in grade 4 were an additional initiative from the eye health care systems in Oman to the actual World Health Organization recommendations of conducting vision screening and RE corrections at grade 7 and 10. However, this was not proved to be significantly effective in early detection, and even the uptake of eye care services by school children was also low.

Keywords: Barriers for service uptake, childhood blindness, compliance, refractive error, school health, spectacle wear, vision screening


How to cite this article:
Al Harby S, Al-Asbali T, Khandekar R. Visual acuity and refractive status of Omani students with refractive error in grades 1, 4 and 7: A retrospective cohort study. Oman J Ophthalmol 2016;9:27-31

How to cite this URL:
Al Harby S, Al-Asbali T, Khandekar R. Visual acuity and refractive status of Omani students with refractive error in grades 1, 4 and 7: A retrospective cohort study. Oman J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 29];9:27-31. Available from: http://www.ojoonline.org/text.asp?2016/9/1/27/176097


   Introduction Top


Visual impairment during childhood can affect overall development. Hence, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended vision screening and refractive error (RE) services for schoolchildren at the ages of 12-13 years and 15-16 years of age. [1] Oman has a highly developed eye health care system through school health programs. For example, Oman adheres to the recommended WHO screening in addition to vision screening of 4 th grade students. [2] However, grade 4 vision screening was not consistent with other school screening initiatives, and this unique initiative was posing some practical program management challenges. Although the screening is evidence-based, consistent with the expansion of eye care services in Oman, the rationale for grade 4 screenings needs to be re-evaluated. [3] Hence, we designed a study to generate evidence-based data from ongoing eye healthcare through school health programs. The objective of this study was to assess the level of visual impairment and RE in grade 7 students and compare their vision screening records to grades 1 and 4 screening to evaluate the benefit of grade 4 screenings. The compliance and uptake of existing eye care services between grades 4 and 7 were also evaluated.


   Methods Top


The eye healthcare committee of the Ministry of Health, Oman approved this study. As this was operational research and part of eye healthcare service delivery at schools, verbal approval of school authorities was obtained, and consent of students was waived. Our study population comprised of students identified having RE during the grade 7 vision screening in seven governorates. Students who were absent during school visits or declined to participate in this study were excluded. This study was performed between January 2012 and September 2012.

To calculate the sample size, we assumed that a 5% prevalence of RE in 7 th grade schoolchildren and in these children, during grade 4, the prevalence was 1%. To achieve 95% confidence and 80% power of the study, 285 children were required in grades 7, 4 and 1. [4] Of all schools in all governorates with grade 7 students with RE, 25% were randomly selected for inclusion in this study.

Health nurses in the schools, who were trained in eye screening, examined study participants. The Snellen illiterate "E" chart at 6 m was used for measuring the distance visual acuity (VA) of each eye. Students with spectacles and students whose vision improved with pinhole testing were reexamined by a school refractionist. The accommodative spasm was neutralized by fogging the eyes, objective refraction was performed with streak retinoscopy (Heine, USA). For students suspected with latent hyperopia and those complaining of eye strain, a cycloplegic refraction was performed using 1% tropicamide eye drops. [5] The students were retested after 48 h and a spectacle prescription was handed over to the school health authority. The screening data was maintained in his/her health record. These health records were reviewed to collect data on vision and refractive status when they were in grades 1 and 4. Procedures for vision testing and refraction in grades 1, grade 4, and grade 7 were similar. Students with visual impairment were graded for functional distance VA in the following manner: Mild visual impairment (VA <6/6 to ≥6/18), moderate visual impairment (MVI) (<6/18-6/60) severe visual impairment (<6/60-3/60), and blind (VA < 3/60). [6] The refractive status was defined as hyperopia, mild myopia (−0.25D to −2D), moderate myopia (>−2D to −6D), and high myopia (>−6D). Students who had their refraction between +0.25D and −0.25D was considered as emmetropic. Hyperopia was classified as any eye with a spherical equivalent of + 0.25D or greater. If astigmatism was <1D, the value was transposed to its spherical equivalent and added to the spherical value and then grade into different types of REs. If astigmatism was more than 1D, the eye was grouped as astigmatic myopia/hyperopia. The eye with worse vision and higher refractive status was used to classify student's visual impairment and RE.

The field staff inquired to the students about their visits to the eye clinic or optical shop in last 3 years. The student was also asked about the reason for noncompliance for spectacle wear.

The data were collected on a pretested form and after auditing, it was transferred to a Microsoft Excel; spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). For univariate analysis, we used Statistical Package for Social Studies (SPSS 11; IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA). Frequencies and percentage proportion were calculated. The Chi-square and two-sided "P" value was used to compared with the rate of RE between genders for grades 1, 4, and 7. Children without RE in grades 1 and 4 grade were monitored for changes in vision or development of RE during the next screening.


   Results Top


The study sample was comprised of 286 students. There were 186 (65%) females. Dhofar and North Batinah governorates comprised of 34% and 27% of the cohort respectively.

From the study sample, there were 239 emmetropes in grade 1. Data were missing for four students, and 43 students had RE (Hyperopia [3] + mild myopia {26}, moderate myopia [1] and astigmatic myopia [13]). Of the 239 emmetropes in grade 1, there were 144 (60%) who remained emmetropic by grade 4. Data were missing for nine students and 86 (36%) developed RE. In grade 4, there were 70 students with mild myopia, six with moderate myopia, three with severe myopia eight with hyperopia and 46 with astigmatic myopia. By grade 7, all 286 students (the entire study sample) had RE. Mild, moderate and severe myopia was noted in 184, 14 and four students respectively. There were 13 hyperopes and 71 astigmatic myopes. The RE profile in all three grades is presented in [Figure 1]. Distance VA in all three grades is presented in [Table 1].
Figure 1: Presenting vision of schoolchildren with refractive error in grades 1, 4 and 7

Click here to view
Table 1: Presenting distance visual acuity (in the better eye) of students in grades 1, 4 and 7

Click here to view


In grade 7, there were 5 of 13 moderate myopes and 3 of 4 high myopes from the 4 th grade vision screening. Hence, RE was detected and managed at least 2 years earlier. All these cases had MVI. Of the 17 cases of newly detected moderate and severe myopia in the 7 th grade, 10 were already using spectacles prescribed by an optometrist or ophthalmologist.

Between grades 4 and 7, 42 (14.7%) had visited a Ministry of Health eye clinic, 24 (8.4%) visited private optometrists and 80 (28%) visited both. Nearly half of participants did not seek assistance with an existing eye care service during this period.

There were 176 (61.5%) of students with RE, who were wearing prescription glasses in grade 7 (spectacle wear compliant). The parents of 170 (59.4%) students paid for spectacles and the Ministry of Education provided funds for six students. The parents of 108 (38%) participants felt that spectacles were not required for their children. Thirty-one (11%) children with spectacles received a prescription from optometrists at private optical shops.

The refractive status for males and females is presented in [Table 2]. The gender variation in RE between grades was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
Table 2: RE in males and females students in grades 1, 4 and 7

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


In this study of a vision and refraction screening program in Oman, we found that screening at grade 4 was not beneficial for detecting students with visual impairment and RE. The existing eye care service was accessible to students who had ocular symptoms due to RE between grades 4 and 7 grade. Although mild myopia and astigmatism developed in students between grades 4 and 7, visual impairment was not advanced enough to be noticed by parents or school health staff and teachers.

Our study was based on a well-established school screening program in Oman that has been in place since 1991 and is endorsed by international agencies for eye care. [7],[8] Therefore, the study outcomes are less likely to be affected by observer and measurement bias. Since students with RE in grade 7 were randomly selected to represent the student population with RE, the study outcomes could be representative of the seven governorates of Oman. As this was a retrospective review of school records when the students in the study sample were in grade 1 (7-year-old records), some missing data were inevitable. Unfortunately, computerized school health records were implemented in 2011 in some governorates as a pilot project and then expanded to all over Oman in 2012. Hence, the records from grade 1 were not digitized at the time of this study that makes data retrieval more complicated. If all cases with missing data in grade 1 were considered to have some sort of RE, universal grade 4 vision screening would be even less justified.

Progression of myopia and determinants of myopia such as family history, the presence of myopia in younger ages and anthropometric measurements of school students have been previously identified. [9],[10],[11] These factors can be used by school health nurses while screening grade 4 students to decide whom to screen for vision instead of universal vision screening.

We found very few students sought eye care services in 3 years despite nearby ophthalmic units or optometry outlets. This observation could be due to the nonsymptomatic nature of emmetropia and mild myopia. Additionally, school teachers and parents could be less aware of the signs of visual impairment and RE in children. Cost is not a factor in the low uptake of eye care services in Oman as eye care by ophthalmic units is available to all Omani citizens at <1 US$.

The compliance of spectacle wear among grade 7 students was 62%. In view of the proactive eye and vision screening in schools and provision of spectacles at a reduced cost, the uptake rate is considered low. The principle of healthcare screening is that early detection leads to the need for remedial action promptly. [12] VA <6/18 due to RE is a predictor of poor compliance with spectacle wear. [13] Thus, better counseling of students and parents regarding the need for spectacles and continual use for overall development of the child could improve compliance.

Eye care program staff often question what the optimal frequency is for eye care screening for schoolchildren. In resourceful countries such as Saudi Arabia, students undergo annual vision screenings. [14] The results of our study indicate that Oman's initiative of screening at grades 1, 4, 7, and 10 is perhaps too frequent. The WHO has recommended vision screening in grades 7 and 10 grade and providing refractive services to those with RE. [15] This recommendation seems to be the best option where eyecare services are easily accessible to the students when they have symptoms or are at high risk of developing severe RE within the two screenings. More frequent screenings will likely result in limited yield and may not be cost effective.


   Conclusions Top


Vision screening and refractive services in grade 4 was an additional initiative to the WHO recommendation of screenings at grades 7 and 10. Grade 4 screenings had limited yield in Oman where eye services are available to students between grades 4 and 7. Lower compliance with spectacle wear among students with mild myopia is understandable. There was no significant variation in RE based on gender at different grades.

Acknowledgments

We thank late Sarvanan, Mr. K. Al Hadrami, Mr. Karunanithy, Mr. Krishnaraj, Mr. Sathish, Mr. A. Sattar, Mr. Ahmed, Ms. Urmi Gogri for their assistance in data collection and service provision to the children with RE. We appreciate the assistance of school authorities and Ministry of Education, Oman.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
World Health Organization. Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness: Action Plan 2006-2011. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/blindness/Vision2020_report.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 08].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization. Guidelines for School Eye Health for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). Cairo: World Health Organization; 2009. p. 5-8. Available from: http://www.pbunion.org/IMPACT-EMR-Guidelines-1.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 08].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Datta KK. Review of Eye Health Care and School Screening. Ministry of Health, Oman: Directorate General of Health Affairs, Ministry of Health, Sultanate of Oman; 2005. p. 1-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Khandekar RB, Abdu-Helmi S. Magnitude and determinants of refractive error in Omani school children. Saudi Med J 2004;25:1388-93.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Egashira SM, Kish LL, Twelker JD, Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Adams AJ. Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia in children. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:1019-26.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
WHO. Prevention of Blindness and Deafness. Consultation on Development of Standards for Characterization of Vision Loss and Visual Functioning. Geneva, 4-5 September 2003, (WHO/PBL/03.91). Geneva: WHO; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Thulasiraj R, Mohiddin S. Eye Health Care Through School Health in Evaluation of ′Vision 2020-Oman. A World Health Organization Consultancy Report. Oman: Published by the Ministry of Health/WHO; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mohammed AJ, Awaidy S, Bawikar S, Khandekar R, Al-Harthy H. World Sight Day 2008. Vol. 17. Muscat, Oman: Community Health and Disease Surveillance Newsletter; 2008. p. 1-16. Available from: http://www.cdscoman.org/uploads/cdscoman/Newsletter%2017-7.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 08].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Khandekar R, Kurup P, Mohammed AJ. Determinants of the progress of myopia among Omani school children: A historical cohort study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2007;17:110-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jones-Jordan LA, Sinnott LT, Manny RE, Cotter SA, Kleinstein RN, Mutti DO, et al. Early childhood refractive error and parental history of myopia as predictors of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:115-21.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Hashemi H, Hatef E, Fotouhi A, Mohammad K. Astigmatism and its determinants in the Tehran population: The Tehran eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005;12:373-81.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hennekens CH, Byrring JE, Mayrent SL. Screening in ′Epidemiology in Medicine′. Boston, USA: Little Brown and Company; 1987. p. 327-45.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Manny RE, Sinnott LT, Jones-Jordan LA, Messer D, Twelker JD, Cotter SA, et al. Predictors of adequate correction following vision screening failure. Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:892-900.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rowaily MA, Alanizi BM. Prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors among adolescents at king Abdul-Aziz medical city, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;1:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
World Health Organization. Elimination of Avoidable Visual Disability Due to Refractive Errors: Report of an Informal Planning Meeting. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. Available from: http://www.apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67800/1/WHO_PBL_00.79.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Mar 08]  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
   
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1810    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded173    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal