About OJO | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Author Instructions | Reviewer Guidelines | Online submissionLogin 
Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Oman Journal of Ophthalmology
  Editorial Board | Subscribe | Advertise | Contact
https://www.omanophthalmicsociety.org/ Users Online: 108  Wide layoutNarrow layoutFull screen layout Home Print this page  Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size


 
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 43 Table of Contents   

Suprachoroidal silicone oil


Vitreoretina Service, Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Beltola, India

Date of Web Publication18-Feb-2010

Correspondence Address:
S Deka
Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Beltola, Guwahati
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-620X.60025

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Deka S, Bhattacharjee H. Suprachoroidal silicone oil. Oman J Ophthalmol 2010;3:43

How to cite this URL:
Deka S, Bhattacharjee H. Suprachoroidal silicone oil. Oman J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2020 Feb 22];3:43. Available from: http://www.ojoonline.org/text.asp?2010/3/1/43/60025

Dear Sir,

Silicone oil (SO), first used by Cibis et al. [1] in early 1960s, has an important role in modern vitreoretinal surgery. We report a case of intraoperative suprachoroidal SO and its management.

A 47-year-old man presented with sudden painless loss of vision in his left eye (OS) of 19 days duration. On examination, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was counting fingers close to face OS. Fundus examination showed a rhegmetogenous retinal detachment (RD) with a shallow choroidal detachment. The patient underwent pars-plana vitrectomy with SO injection. During SO-air exchange, suprachoroidal SO infusion was noted as a choroidal elevation. SO-air exchange was stopped and location of the infusion cannula checked. Once the tip of the cannula was confirmed to be in the vitreous cavity, SO injection was restarted to completely fill the vitreous cavity with SO. During early postoperative period, the patient's intra ocular pressure (IOP) was normal and retina was attached. Choroidal elevation due to suprachoroidal SO was seen in fundus periphery [Figure 1]a. The patient underwent SO removal, membrane removal and repeat-SO injection for recurrent RD with proliferative vitreoretinopathy after two months. During SO removal, suprachoroidal SO removal was done by negotiating the superotemporal sclerotomy without entering the vitreous cavity. Ringer lactate solution was infused into the vitreous cavity simultaneously. Subsequently, the patient underwent routine SO removal with epiretinal membrane removal four months after the second surgery. The final BCVA two months after the third surgery was 6/24, N: 10. The fundus picture showed attached retina [Figure 1]b.

Under normal circumstances, hydrostatic pressure in the suprachoroidal space is equal to the IOP. [2] We postulate that transient hypotony towards the end of the SO-air exchange caused a local choroidal detachment, allowing the tip of the infusion cannula to enter the suprachoroidal space. An inadvertent pull on the infusion cannula and simultaneous injection of the SO could also have initiated a separation between the choroid and the sclera, allowing egress of silicone oil into the suprachoroidal space. Since retina was seen to be attached at the end of surgery, silicone oil tamponade was considered to be sufficient, and no further intervention was done.

The sequelae of suprachoroidal silicone probably depend on the amount and location of suprachoroidal silicone. A large volume may result in ciliary detachment and hypotony; a more centrally located suprachoroidal SO can affect the vision. However, a small amount of SO away from the macula may be well tolerated as was noted in our case. Although the effects of SO on the retina remain controversial, [3] there are no reported toxic effects of SO on the choroid. A recurrent RD in our patient two months after initial surgery necessitated resurgery. During this procedure, the suprachoroidal SO was removed. Although complete removal was attempted, small emulsified globules were difficult to remove.

The eye remained stable at the six month follow-up examination after suprachoroidal SO removal. Suprachoroidal SO is a rare complication; SO can be removed through a sclerotomy without entering the vitreous cavity during routine SO removal procedure.

 
   References Top

1.Cibis PA, Becker B, Okun E, Canaan S. The use of liquid silicone in retinal detachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1962;68:590-9.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Emi K, Pederson JE, Toris CB. Hydrostatic pressure of the suprachoroidal space. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:233-8.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Ohira A, Wilson CA, deJuan E Jr, Murata Y, Soji T, Oshima K. Experimental retinal tolerance to emulsified silicone oil. Retina 1991;11:259-65.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Management of Suprachoroidal 5,000-Centistoke Silicone Oil: Two Contrasting Approaches
Jonathan S. Chang,D. Wilkin Parke,Harry W. Flynn,Avinash Pathengay,Thomas Albini
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2013; 44(6): 610
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Suprachoroidal Silicone Oil Migration Following Retinal Detachment Repair
Nataliya Danylkova,Nitasha Gupta,Chirag D. Jhaveri,Manjot K. Gill
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2013; 44(3): 284
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2106    
    Printed147    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded392    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal